-Algebra and Measurable Spaces
-Algebra
Suppose is a set and is a set of subsets of . Then is called a -algebra on if it is closed under countable unions, countable intersections, and complements:
- ;
- if , then ;
- if , then .
Note that the closedness on countable intersections comes freely from (2) and (3).
Measurable Space
A measurable space is an ordered pair of a set and an associated -algebra . An element of is called an -measurable set, or just a measurable set.
Proposition
Suppose is a set and is a set of subsets of . Then the intersection of all -algebras on that contain is a -algebra on .
Proof
Measurable Functions
Measurable Function
Suppose and are measurable spaces. A function is an measurable function if
Essential Range
The essential range of a measurable function is the set where is a measure on .
Measure Spaces
Measure
Suppose is a measurable space. A measure on is a function such that: and for any countable collection of disjoint sets in . In this case, we call a measure space.
Proposition
For a measure defined on a measurable space , the following properties hold:
- Monotonicity: for ,
- Subadditivity: .
Proof Observe that for any , and are disjoint, and , thus For subadditivity, we can divide the union into disjoint sets. Suppose , let , and for . Then each is disjoint, and we have where the last inequality follows from monotonicity.
-Finite Measure
A measure space is -finite if there exists a countable collection of measurable sets such that and for all .
e.g.
- The Lebesgue measure on is -finite because .
- The counting measure on is not -finite, because one cannot decompose into a countable union of sets with finite cardinality.
Complete Measure
A measure defined on a measurable space is complete if for all that and implies .
Exterior Measure and Carathéodory Theorem
Exterior (Outer) Measure
Let be a set. The exterior measure on is defined on all subsets of to such that
- ;
- if ;
- .
Carathéodory Measurable
Suppose is an exterior measure. A set in is Carathéodory measurable or simply measurable if one has
Carathéodory Theorem
Given an exterior measure on a set , the collection of Carathéodory measurable sets forms a -algebra. Moreover, restricted to is a measure.
Proof Clearly, and belong to and ,
One of the most important examples of exterior measure is the exterior measure on metric spaces, which is defined as follows:
Metric Exterior Measure
An exterior measure on a metric space is called a metric exterior measure if it satisfies
This property plays a crucial role in the case of exterior Lebesgue measure.
Theorem
If is a metric exterior measure on a metric space , then the Borel sets in are measurable. Hence restricted to the Borel sets is a measure.
The Extension Theorem
Boolean Algebra
Let be a set. A boolean algebra on is a nonempty collection of subsets satisfies
- ,
- If , then ,
- If and are elements of , then .
In other words, is closed under complements, finite unions, and finite intersections.
Premeasure
A premeasure on a boolean algebra over a set , is a function such that
- .
- If is a countable collection of disjoint sets in with , then
Premeasures give rise to exterior measures in a natural way:
Lemma
If is a premeasure on a boolean algebra over , define on any subset by Then is an exterior measure on satisfying for all , and all sets in are Carathéodory measurable.
Carathéodory’s Extension Theorem
Suppose that is a boolean algebra of sets in , is a premeasure on , and is the -algebra generated by (i.e., the smallest -algebra containing ). Then there exists a measure on that extends . Moreover, if is -finite, then it is unqiue.
Proof This is a direct consequence of the above lemma. induces an exterior measure , which is a measure on the -algebra of Carathéodory measurable sets. As all sets in are Carathéodory measurable, and is generated by , all sets in are also Carathéodory measurable. Therefore is a measure on as well, and we call it . To prove the uniqueness, we suppose is another measure defined on that extends . Let containing where each . Then there holds
Pick a set with . If for each , then so by taking the infimum over all such covers of . To prove the reverse inequality, note that
Assume is -finite. We claim that . Observe that since is -finite, we may write , where is a countable collection of disjoint sets in with . Then we have Let