user: What is pullback of a vector field? [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:13:39]
ai: In differential geometry one usually defines the pushforward of a vector field—not its pullback. Given a smooth map F: M → N and a vector field X on M, one can push it forward to a vector field F₍*₎X on N (provided F is smooth), but “pulling back” a vector field on N to M is not generally defined unless F is a diffeomorphism (or at least locally invertible). In the case where F is a diffeomorphism, one can define the pullback of a vector field Y on N by
FY = (F⁻¹)₍₎Y
so that F*Y is a vector field on M. This definition is possible because F⁻¹ exists and allows one to take the pushforward in the reverse direction.
In summary, while pulling back differential forms is always well-defined via the pullback F*ω, pulling back vector fields is not done in general. Instead, one typically works with the pushforward, and a pullback of a vector field is only available when F is a diffeomorphism (or under certain additional conditions enabling the definition of an inverse mapping on the tangent spaces).
Sources:
- Differential Forms [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:18:08]
user: Is it true that if is a flow generated by ? [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:20:05]
ai: Yes, that’s correct, with the proper interpretation of the pullback for vector fields. For a flow Φₛ generated by a vector field X, if we define the pullback of a vector field Y (when the map is a diffeomorphism) as
Φₛ* Y = (Φₛ⁻¹)₍*₎ Y,
then in particular we have
Φₛ* X = X.
To explain briefly: Since X generates the flow Φₛ, the pushforward of X by its own flow satisfies
(Φₛ)₍*₎ X = X.
Taking the pullback (which is defined via the inverse of Φₛ), we recover
Φₛ* X = (Φₛ⁻¹)₍*₎ X = X.
Another way to see this is by recalling that the Lie derivative of X in the direction of itself is zero, i.e. 𝓛ₓX = 0. Since the Lie derivative is the infinitesimal generator of the flow, this means that the flow leaves the vector field invariant.
Thus, if Φₛ is the (local) flow of X, then indeed Φₛ* X = X.
Sources:
- Integral Curves and Flows
- Symplectic Structures [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:20:14]
user: Can you show this in detail? [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:23:33]
ai: Let’s work through a detailed explanation. Assume is the local flow of , so that for each point in the manifold, the curve
satisfies the initial value problem
Because generates the flow, its Lie derivative along itself must vanish; that is,
This fact underlies the invariance of under the flow. To see this more directly, let’s recall the definition of the pullback of a vector field under a diffeomorphism. For any diffeomorphism , the pullback of a vector field is given by
which means that for any point , we have
Now, let’s plug in and set . Then
Since is generated by , by the definition of a flow we have
The key observation is that the flow “moves forward” in such a way that pushing forward the vector field along its own flow reproduces itself. More specifically, the pushforward of by satisfies
Now, applying the definition of the pullback using the inverse flow, we get:
Since pushing forward and then pulling back by the inverse cancels out, we have
This shows that
Thus, we conclude:
To summarize in simple terms:
- The flow generated by moves points along the integral curves of .
- Pushing forward by the flow gives back the value of at the new point.
- Pulling back with the inverse of the flow reverses this operation, returning to the original vector .
- Therefore, pulling back by leaves it unchanged.
This completes the detailed demonstration.
Sources:
- Explain like I am 5
- Microarchitecture
- Simplify
- Make longer
- Algorithms [Timestamp: 2025/08/13 18:23:50]