Weak Order

(i) means that , for some such that , . (ii) means that , for some such that , .

Proposition

(i) There is a one-to-one correspondence between reduced decompositions of and maximal chains in the interval . (ii) . (iii) If is finite, then for all . (iv) Weak order satisfies the “prefix property” (v) Weak order satisfies a “chain property” analogous to the chain property in Bruhat order. (vi) Suppose . Then, . .

Proposition

.

Corollary

The mapping provides an order-preserving and rank-preserving embedding of , as a poset under weak order, into the lattice of all finite subsets of .

Weak order on a finite Coxeter group shares with Bruhat order the symmetries induced by the top element.

Proposition

For weak order on a finite _, the following hold (i) and are antiautomorphisms. (ii) is an automorphism

Proposition

If , then

An element in a poset is said to be the meet (or, greatest lower bound) of a subset if (i) for all , and (ii) for all implies that . The meet, if it exists, is clearly unique. It is then denoted , or if , simply . A poset for which every nonempty subset has a meet is called a complete meet-semilattice. Such a poset has a minimum element .

Theorem

Weak order on is a complete meet-semilattice.