Complex Differentiability
-Differentiability
Suppose is open, a function is -differentiable at if exists, in which case we call the limit . Equivalently, is -differentiable if there exists a complex number such that
e.g. is -differentiable but not -differentiable.
The Cauchy-Riemann Equations
Cauchy-Riemann Equations
Let be open, let , and let . Write . Then the Cauchy-Riemann equations are
Dolbeaut Operators
The Dolbeaut operators for some complex functions are defined as: \begin{align}\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}:=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\\\frac{\partial f}{\partial\bar{z}}:=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}+i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)\end{align}
e.g. This agrees with how we think differentiating with respect to should work, and indeed the same goes for applying and to polynomials in and . We will see for one thing that is -differentiable only at by the following theorem:
Theorem
Let be open, let , and let . Write . Then the following are equivalent:
- is -differentiable at and .
- is -differentiable at and the Jacobian .
- is -differentiable at , and we have the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold.
- is -differentiable at , and . In this case .
Proof The last three arguments are equivalent simply by definition of Jacobian. To see the first two are equivalent, suppose , we just check this is equivalent to the Jacobian in terms of multiplication:and accordingly in , we have $$\begin{pmatrix}a\Delta x-b\Delta y\b\Delta x+a\Delta y\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}a&-b\b&a\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\Delta x\\Delta y\end{pmatrix}$$$\square$
e.g. Consider . Cleary is -differentiable. Now check that the Cauchy-Riemann equation holds: So is -differentiable everywhere.
Corollary
-differentiable functions are continuous.
Proof -differentiability implies -differentiability, and -differentiability implies continuity.